Modeling of Dezincing of
Galvanized Steel Scrap
Ezaz Ahmed and Abhijit
Ray*
Department of Biotechnology, Raipur
Institute of Technology, Raipur
ABSTRACT
Dezincing of galvanized steel
scrap was investigated by preferential dissolution of the galvanized coatings
in a variety of acidic environments comprising dilute and moderate
concentrations of Hydrochloric, Sulfuric and Nitric Acids. The data thus
generated was used to develop an Artificial Neural Network model to estimate
the extent of dezincing as a function of thickness
and concentration of acids. It was found that the model developed has very good
accuracy level.
Key words: Dezincing,
galvanized steel, Artificial Neural Network.
INTRODUCTION:
Bastar plateau is having good
agro climatic situation for maize production Good quality steel scarp
is always a preferable and important source of raw material for steel industry.
However recent study shows that there will soon be a shortage of good quality
steel scrap and scrap from steel processing industry given the high rate of
ferrous consumption. Like in conventional basic oxygen steel
making ferrous acts both as a source of Iron and as a cooling medium.
Hence, there is a need to generate usable scrap from steel-intensive consumer
goods and redundant investment goods. Every year large amount of cold rolled
steel is used as a raw material in automobile industry in most of developed and
developing nations. The resultant scrap is basically a mixture of single sided
and double sided galvanized or zinc-coated steel. Only a small percentage of
the scrap is zinc free. In India some other industrial and domestic application
of galvanized steel includes construction of pipes, water tanks, storage
vessels, transportation case linings fences, roofing sheets, buckets, etc. The
large volume of scrap generated from these applications together with scrap
from disused or redundant impose serious problems to corrosion and material
engineers, particularly in the underdeveloped countries, where, due to poor
maintenance and inadequate material reclamation schemes, most of these scraps
are usually dumped and allowed to waste away in the open areas, causing serious
environmental and safety hazards.
Methods of Recycling Of Galvanized Steel
Scrap
Survey of literature
shows that most of chemical recycling techniques for galvanized steel involves
use of alkaline
dezincing[1] i.e. use of hot caustic soda (NaOH)
to form sodium zincate(Na2ZnO2) and (NaHZnO2). The
zinc is recovered as a dendritic powder while the
zinc-free steel is readily utilized by the foundries. In this process
dissolution occurs at a measurable rate only if the zinc is in electrical
contact with a material of lower hydrogen over potential such as platinum, iron
and nickel or if a strong oxidizing agent is added. However, acid–dezincing technique fig(1) is duly
recommended as an efficient and economically viable alternative for dezincing of galvanized steel scrap[2]. The very low acid
concentrations usually involved makes the scheme rather safe and the dezincing reaction occurs spontaneously with no need for
heating or use of external electric power. The important reason behind the use
of dilute acids is to completely dissolve the zinc coating with little or no
inherent attack on underlying steel substrate which is ultimately recycled from
various end uses while the zinc is recovered from solution either in the pure
form or as a specific metal salt dependent upon the type of acid used for the stripping.
An
Artificial Neural Network is an information-processing paradigm that is
inspired by the way brain process information. It is composed of a large number
of highly interconnected processing elements (neurons) working in unison to
solve the specific problems [3]. Knowledge is internally presented by the value
of the weights and the topology of connections. ANN learns from examples, a
certain set of input-output mapping by optimizing weights on the branches that
link the nodes of the ANN. Once the
structure of input output space is learned, novel input pattern can be
classified. These networks can learn and adapt themselves to input from the
actual process allowing representation of complex engineering system, which are
difficult to model either with traditional model based, or engineering
knowledge based expert system. ANN performs successfully where other methods do
not succeed. Basically most application of Neural Network falls into the
following categories like prediction, classification, data association,
nonlinear mapping, pattern recognition etc. ANN has been shown to be extremely
suited to model highly complex and nonlinear
phenomena. Most common for chemical engineering application is MLP, which is a
Multilayer feed forward network. MLP is trained using back propagation
algorithm suggested by Rumelhart [4]. Back
propagation is generalized for Window-Hoff learning rule to multiple layer
networks and nonlinear differentiable transfer functions. A schematic of the
MLP network with two hidden layer is as shown in fig 2.
A – Galvanized
steel scrap B – Zinc Solution
C - Washer
D - Dezinced
Steel
E – Spent Acid F –
Zinc Recovery
G – Zinc Salt
Fig
1.
Schematic illustration of the acid chemical recycling of galvanized steel scrap
Various applications of ANN are, modeling of distillation
column [4], modeling of heat exchanger [5], and hybrid first principles model
for fixed bed reactor [6]
Experimental Procedure
Galvanized
steel sheets of various thickness viz
0.45mm, 0.65mm, & 1.15 mm were taken. These were cut into small rectangular
pieces of 4x4cm prior to dezincing in 0.05N, 0.1N,
0.25N of 100ml HCl, H2SO4 and
HNO3and the respective dezincing time were
carefully recorded. Each specimen were carefully weighed, clamped to a specimen
holder and suspended vertically downward in a vessel containing appropriate
acid medium. Total immersion of the pieces was ensured. The specimen were
consecutively corroded for 2min., 3min., 5min., 10min., 1hr., 2hr., and 5hr.,
(or more) after which they were thoroughly rinsed with distilled water, dried
in a steam of hot air and weighed. The weight loss were then determined by the difference
in weights before and after the experiment and curve between weight loss and
time were plotted for galvanized steel in specific acid environment.
Thickness I
Fig 2. A schematic of artificial neural
network with two hidden layer
Method of data generation
The
data thus generated by the experiments were divided into two parts training
data set and test data set. Training data set were used to train the neural
network model whereas test set was used to test the accuracy of prediction of
the trained network. Different types of network architecture were tried to find
the best model for dezincing of galvanized steel.
Table
1- Weight loss versus time measurements for galvanized steel scrap under
varying acidic medium Specimen
thickness – 0.45mm
|
Time
(Min) |
Weight
Loss (gm) |
||||||||
|
HCl |
H2SO4 |
HNO3 |
|||||||
|
0.05
N |
0.1N |
0.25N |
0.05N |
0.1N |
0.25N |
0.05N |
0.1N |
0.25
N |
|
|
5 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.1 |
0.001 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.02 |
0.04 |
|
10 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
0.11 |
0.005 |
0.03 |
0.04 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.18 |
|
15 |
0.025 |
0.04 |
0.12 |
0.005 |
0.03 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.07 |
0.26 |
|
20 |
0.025 |
0.04 |
0.14 |
0.01 |
0.03 |
0.14 |
0.07 |
0.12 |
0.32 |
|
30 |
0.03 |
0.05 |
0.16 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.41 |
0.08 |
0.16 |
0.4 |
|
60 |
0.04 |
0.06 |
0.185 |
0.1 |
0.32 |
0.41 |
0.1 |
0.17 |
0.41 |
|
120 |
0.05 |
0.08 |
0.19 |
0.105 |
0.325 |
0.42 |
0.12 |
0.2 |
0.43 |
|
180 |
0.05 |
0.09 |
0.19 |
0.12 |
0.33 |
0.43 |
0.145 |
0.24 |
0.49 |
|
240 |
0.055 |
0.1 |
0.195 |
0.12 |
0.34 |
0.43 |
0.15 |
0.25 |
0.55 |
|
300 |
0.06 |
0.11 |
0.2 |
0.12 |
0.34 |
0.45 |
0.15 |
0.28 |
0.61 |
Specimen thickness – 0.65mm
|
Time
(Min) |
Weight
Loss (gm) |
||||||||
|
HCl |
H2SO4 |
HNO3 |
|||||||
|
0.05N |
0.1N |
0.25N |
0.05N |
0.1N |
0.25
N |
0.05N |
0.1N |
0.25
N |
|
|
5 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.02 |
0.05 |
0.01 |
0.04 |
0.05 |
|
10 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.08 |
0.15 |
0.02 |
0.06 |
0.09 |
|
15 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.06 |
0.08 |
0.19 |
0.29 |
0.04 |
0.1 |
0.18 |
|
20 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0.26 |
0.29 |
0.06 |
0.14 |
0.24 |
|
30 |
0.02 |
0.07 |
0.21 |
0.14 |
0.27 |
0.29 |
0.1 |
0.18 |
0.29 |
|
60 |
0.07 |
0.15 |
0.25 |
0.21 |
0.28 |
0.29 |
0.12 |
0.21 |
0.39 |
|
120 |
0.11 |
0.19 |
0.25 |
0.29 |
0.28 |
0.31 |
0.15 |
0.23 |
0.51 |
|
180 |
0.13 |
0.21 |
0.25 |
0.3 |
0.31 |
0.36 |
0.16 |
0.24 |
0.63 |
|
270 |
0.14 |
0.22 |
0.27 |
0.31 |
0.33 |
0.41 |
0.16 |
0.24 |
0.66 |
|
300 |
0.15 |
0.23 |
0.275 |
0.31 |
0.33 |
0.49 |
0.17 |
0.25 |
0.67 |
Network Topology
|
Number
of Neurons |
Sum
of square of errors |
|||
|
I
Layer |
II
Layer |
III
Layer |
IV
Layer |
|
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4x10-3 |
|
10 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1.8x10-5 |
|
4 |
12 |
1 |
0 |
7.5x10-6 |
|
3 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
8.1x10-6 |
Specimen
thickness 0.45mm
fig.3
Specimen thickness 0.45mm
fig.4
specimen thickness 0.65mm
fig
5
[6] Zhou, X., Qi,
H., and Yuan, W., “Hybrid First Principles Model for Fixed Bed Reactor”, Chem Eng. Sci., vol-54,pp.
2521-2526,(1999)
Received on 10.12.2009
Accepted on 28.12.2009
© A &V Publication
all right reserved
Research J. Science
and Tech. 1(3): Nov. Dec. 2009: 113-114